The Bluebird Project

It's all very interesting that the Ruskin Museum have seen fit to publish the 2006 deed of gift, which served admirably to prove at long last to those who doubted that in fact BBP was not a party to it but Interesting too that they have also published the letter of authority for you to restore the ...

You didn’t answer my questions any reason???? I didn't think them important enough to warrant a response. But since you insist: No, I don't think that the 3month/9month agreement is fair, for the simple reason that Billy has no legal right to impose any terms upon the Ruskin about how they dispose ...

Why such an aggressive tone in your postings? ...it’s not doing you any favours in name calling and being aggressive. Jordan, Mr. Shitrack has no testicles, which is a shame because if he possessed a pair that matched the weight of his on-line bravado they would undoubtedly have sufficient mass to ...

t's a perfectly valid answer. In a Billy Liar fantasy world, perhaps. Everyone else will see it as yet more evasion to add to the excuses. To answer your question: I believe that you once managed to convince yourself that I was Jim Noone... in which case I see no reason to disabuse you of that fant...

That's not an answer, its an excuse. If you've got the necessary evidence, as you claim you have, then its publication would satisfy the vast majority of people, and pull the rug out from under the trolls feet. More importantly, it would also pull the rug out from under the Ruskin's feet. So why not...

None of which answers my question:

If you've got the 'necessary proof', as you claim, why don't you just publish it, as the Museum has done, and resolve the matter in the public domain, once and for all?

Are you sure about that, Bill?

The documents published by the museum seem to very clearly say different.

If, as you say, you have the 'necessary proof', surely now is long past the time you should publish it yourself?

Renegadenemo wrote: ↑

Sun Jan 12, 2020 1:07 pm

...we don't need to transfer anything anywhere because it's already ours.

Allegedly

This article should explain most of what you need to know: https://www-dailymail-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7875041/amp/Donald-Campbells-daughter-70-watched-fathers-iconic-record-breaker-Bluebird-restored.html?usqp=mq331AQCKAE%3D&_js_v=0.1&fbclid=IwAR18HOfxW5LU1...

Filtertron wrote: ↑

Mon May 06, 2019 5:49 pm

Getting personal is extremely unprofessional, and is only used as a tactic when there isn't a valid argument to be made.

You might want to remind others around here of that fact... you know, the ones who invented the term 'Type 3' for that specific purpose?