Oh no!someone is going to attempt to block BB's return and run by way of high court appeal.
I got a text earlier saying, 'possible type-III activity on forum'.
I panicked initially, fearing the re-emergence of the dreaded, Bridget Jones of the 'Group Opposed to the Running of K7... or whatever stupid long-winded name they dreamt up in order to deliver a not so anonymous, thirty-thousand-word trilogy to the park authority whilst leaving their names and addresses in the file properties of the document. But then it emerged that the whistle-blower this time was none other that other cartoon villain, the man with the magic shovel.
Yet to the best of my knowledge they've never been associates and such an unlikely collaboration would be like Lord Sugar going into business with the bloke who runs the hot dog van at the match so I'm not buying it.
So... High Court appeal, eh? Appeal against what, exactly? have I missed an action that's climbed all the way to the supreme courts without me being invited to defend our scurrilous scheme? Or has the British judicial system altered to the point where you can nip down to the Strand, bash on the door and say, 'Hey, Judgie, I'm a bit miffed with what this hydroplane lot are wanting to do!'.
I'd say we can lower our state of readiness, folks. It's only type II activity.